New mRNA Vaccine is More Effective and Less Costly to Develop, Pitt Study Finds

Updated on June 2, 2025

A new type of mRNA vaccine is more scalable and adaptable to continuously evolving viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and H5N1, according to a study by researchers at University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health and the Pennsylvania State University. The study was published today in NPJ Vaccines.   

Though highly effective at inducing an immune response, current mRNA vaccines, such as those used to prevent COVID-19, present two significant challenges: the high amount of mRNA needed to produce them and the constantly evolving nature of the pathogen.  

“The virus changes, moving the goal post, and updating the vaccine takes some time,” said senior author Suresh Kuchipudi, Ph.D., chair of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology at Pitt Public Health.  

To address these challenges, the researchers created a proof-of-concept COVID-19 vaccine using what’s known as a “trans-amplifying” mRNA platform. In this approach, the mRNA is separated into two fragments—the antigen sequence and the replicase sequence—the latter of which can be produced in advance, saving crucial time in the event a new vaccine must be developed urgently and produced at scale.  

Additionally, the researchers analyzed the spike-protein sequences of all known variants of the SARS-CoV-2 for commonalities, rendering what’s known as a “consensus spike protein” as the basis for the vaccine’s antigen.  

In mice, the vaccine induced a robust immune response against many strains of SARS-CoV-2.  

“This has the potential for more lasting immunity that would not require updating, because the vaccine has the potential to provide broad protection,” said Kuchipudi. “Additionally, this format requires an mRNA dose 40 times less than conventional vaccines, so this new approach significantly reduces the overall cost of the vaccine.” 

The lessons learned from this study could inform more efficient vaccine development for other constantly evolving RNA viruses with pandemic potential, Kuchipudi said. “We hope to apply the principles of this lower-cost, broad-protection antigen design to pressing challenges like bird flu.”  

Other authors on the study were Abhinay Gontu, Padmaja Jakka, Ph.D., Maurice Byukusenge, D.V.M., Ph.D., D.A.C.V.M., Meera Surendran Nair, Bhushan M. Jayarao, MV Sc., Ph.D., M.P.H., Marco Archetti, Ph.D., and Ruth H. Nissly, Ph.D., all of Pennsylvania State University; and Sougat Misra, Ph.D., Shubhada K. Chothe, Ph.D., MV Sc., BV Sc, Santhamani Ramasamy, Ph.D., D.A.C.V.M., and Lindsey C. LaBella, all of Pitt. 

This research was supported by chair funds from the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences and Interdisciplinary Innovation Fellowship at the One Health Microbiome Center at Pennsylvania State University. 

+ posts

Throughout the year, our writers feature fresh, in-depth, and relevant information for our audience of 40,000+ healthcare leaders and professionals. As a healthcare business publication, we cover and cherish our relationship with the entire health care industry including administrators, nurses, physicians, physical therapists, pharmacists, and more. We cover a broad spectrum from hospitals to medical offices to outpatient services to eye surgery centers to university settings. We focus on rehabilitation, nursing homes, home care, hospice as well as men’s health, women’s heath, and pediatrics.

Disclaimer: The content on this site is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as medical, legal, or financial advice. No content published here should be construed as a substitute for professional advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult with a qualified healthcare or legal professional regarding your specific needs.

See our full disclaimer for more details.